[Ml-yokadi] feature request

[David Faure]

On Monday 17 August 2009, David Faure wrote:
> I'm quite confused now, actually, the details seem to escape me.
> The -g option sounds fine to me, what's the other solution?
> The "t_list @keyword projects" one, implicitly grouping on keywords?
> I guess explicit is better than implicit, for future extensions, no?

On that topic, the current implementation of t_list -k is already quite ok,
except that it lists all internal keywords like _bug, _likelihood and 
_severity. Could _% be excluded?

For my own needs, if that's done I don't really need -g, I don't have that
many tasks per keyword, per-project grouping or filtering isn't really needed 
[for now ;)].


PS: thanks for the alias support, it rocks!

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Qt Software @ Nokia to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).