Le mercredi 29 juillet 2009 14:08:54, Aurélien Gâteau a écrit : > If I am not mistaken, -k is the equivalent of '-g %'. > I am wondering if > there is a need for this. t_list already has a lot of switches, so I > would like to avoid adding redundant ones. Ok. So, once -g is implemented we have to remove -k. a+ -- Sébastien